Search This Blog








2023 Literary Escapes Challenge
- Alabama (1)
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California (1)
- Colorado (1)
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia (1)
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana (1)
- Maine (1)
- Maryland (1)
- Massachusetts (1)
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York (2)
- North Carolina (1)
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina (1)
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont (2)
- Virginia
- Washington (1)
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- Washington, D.C.*
International:
- Australia (1)
- Ireland (1)





2023 Build Your Library Reading Challenge







Wednesday, March 06, 2013
Finding June: Another Example of Why "Self-Centered Heroine" Is An Oxymoron
1:00 AM
(Image from Barnes & Noble)

June's co-stars aren't sure what to make of the 16-year-old Mormon girl who won't drink coffee and balks at the skimpy costumes she's supposed to wear. She's not sure either. June wants this gig so badly she doesn't dare mess it up by asking the producer for something more modest to wear. Does she? It doesn't help matters that the Lukas Leighton seems to be falling for her. Are a part on a t.v. show and the attention of a gorgeous actor really worth compromising June's standards? As the pressure mounts, she'll have to decide how much she's willing to sacrifice to get what—and who—she wants.

That being said, Finding June pretty much annoyed me from the first sentence to the last. Why, you ask? Well, it starts with the fact that this story has no central conflict. It sounds like it does with the whole compromising standards thing, but that's actually sort of a subplot. And not a very interesting one at that (although it definitely could have been). In truth, the story really doesn't have much conflict at all. It's pretty obvious how the book's going to turn out, since this premise/plotline's been done a bajillion times and Crane doesn't bother to throw in any surprises to make June's tale unique. Plus, June never really struggles with anything. At all. She's self-centered, insensitive, clueless and yet everyone loves her and gives her exactly what she wants? I don't buy it. For me to really get behind a heroine (or hero), I have to see her fight to attain her goals, I have to see her fail so she can pick herself up and continue to claw her way through her troubles, I have to see her care for someone (or something) beyond herself, I have to find something in her to admire. That didn't happen with June. She's too flat, too self-absorbed, too unrealistic.
I have more beefs with Finding June, but I think I'll stop there. Suffice it to say, I didn't care much for this one. Crane's got the right idea, IMHO, she just needs to work on creating deeper, more empathetic characters; plotlines that twist in surprising directions; and richer, more vivid prose. Piece of cake, right?
(Readalikes: Reminds me a lot of V is for Virgin by Kelly Oram and a teensy tiny bit of My Double Life by Janette Rallison)
Grade: D
If this were a movie, it would be rated: PG for mild language (no F-bombs) and mild sexual innuendo
To the FTC, with love: I received an e-copy of Finding June as part of my participation as a judge for the Whitney Awards. Thank you!
3 comments:
Comments make me feel special, so go crazy! Just keep it clean and civil. Feel free to speak your mind (I always do), but be aware that I will delete any offensive comments.
P.S.: Don't panic if your comment doesn't show up right away. I have to approve each one before it posts to prevent spam. It's annoying, but it works!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(Atom)




Reading
All the Dangerous Things by Stacy Willingham

Listening
The War Librarian by Addison Armstrong



Followin' with Bloglovin'



-
Monthly Round-up: January 20234 hours ago
-
-
Top Ten Tuesday ~ Just for Fun Quotes5 hours ago
-
-
January Reflections7 hours ago
-
-
-
-
Books read in January9 hours ago
-
Coetzee, J.M. "Waiting for the Barbarians"9 hours ago
-
Top Ten Tuesday! Wintery book covers10 hours ago
-
-
Top Ten Tuesday11 hours ago
-
-
-
-
Top Ten Tuesday: Bookish Confessions14 hours ago
-
Top Ten New-to-me Authors in 202215 hours ago
-
TTT – My Favorite Black Authors15 hours ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
A Novel Disguise by Samantha Larsen1 day ago
-
Book’d Out [January 2023]1 day ago
-
Sunday Salon: January 29, 20232 days ago
-
-
Sunday Salon2 days ago
-
-
Sunday Post #4894 days ago
-
-
Review of Matilda4 days ago
-
-
-
-
My Bookish Goals for 20231 week ago
-
Top Ten Books of 20223 weeks ago
-
Books Read in 20233 weeks ago
-
December Monthly Wrap-up3 weeks ago
-
-
-
Thinking Out Loud: Our Wives Under the Sea2 months ago
-
Are you looking for Pretty Books?3 months ago
-
-
HEARTS OF BRIARWALL by Krista Jensen5 months ago
-
-
-
-

Grab my Button!



Blog Archive
- ► 2021 (159)
- ► 2020 (205)
- ► 2019 (197)
- ► 2018 (223)
- ► 2017 (157)
- ► 2016 (157)
- ► 2015 (188)
A well-written review! You laid the things that didn't work for you but also pointed out a few strengths. I don't think I'll be picking this one up, in part because I'm not that into contemporary YA, but largely because June doesn't sound like an appealing heroine. I don't need heroines to be sympathetic or likable, but like you, I think they need to grow, struggle, and/or change.
ReplyDeleteThanks! My intent is never to slam a book into the ground -- I only try to point out what didn't work for me and why. I don't necessarily need a heroine to be likable, but I do need her to be empathetic. Otherwise, I really have no reason to care. And, if the heroine doesn't struggle a little with whatever journey she's undertaken, I have no reason to root for her. So, yeah. This could be a whole 'nother blog topic -- I may just have to write something up about unlikable/unsympathetic heroes/heroines. It would be interesting to see what everyone thinks.
DeleteThanks for commenting!
Glad you liked the cover! Always good to have feedback from readers to improve in the future :)
ReplyDelete